Selected foundations across eight lessons in six local teaching groups; not complete official competency coverage.. Selected foundation practice, not a complete exam simulation.
Try 10 original samples with answers below, or start a personal practice set.
Free access · No sign-up · No personal progress recorded on this page · Coverage & review notes
TRY A QUESTION. FOLLOW THE REASONING.
Sample questions with answers
Work out your answer first, then compare the explanation. This stable selection uses distinct task families across the available learning domains.
QUESTION 01Empiricism and Scrum values
Empiricism and Scrum values
A delivery team holds frequent inspection meetings, but its dashboard counts work as complete before the required quality checks finish. Stakeholders use that dashboard to choose the next investment. Which action most directly repairs the empirical decision process?
Add another inspection meeting using the existing completion figures.
Make the actual completion state visible before interpreting the results and adapting investment.
Keep the dashboard unchanged so that historical trend lines stay comparable.
Choose the next investment from the original plan until every uncertainty disappears.
Answer: Make the actual completion state visible before interpreting the results and adapting investment.
Inspection depends on a sufficiently transparent account of the work. A completion figure that includes work failing the quality boundary can make a frequent meeting produce a misleading conclusion. Make the actual state and its limitations visible, then inspect and adapt decisions using that evidence. Historical comparisons can be explained rather than protected by preserving a misleading definition. The objective is not perfect information; it is an honest basis for an appropriate next decision.
Compare the other answer choices
Add another inspection meeting using the existing completion figures.
Increasing meeting frequency does not correct misleading input; the same incomplete work would still appear finished.
Keep the dashboard unchanged so that historical trend lines stay comparable.
Comparable numbers are not useful if their meaning conceals unfinished quality work. Explain the changed interpretation transparently.
Choose the next investment from the original plan until every uncertainty disappears.
Empirical decisions use observed evidence and acknowledged uncertainty; waiting for certainty or following an obsolete plan avoids adaptation.
Reference basis: The Scrum Guide — November 2020. These are original learning questions, not questions reproduced from the references.
QUESTION 02Scrum Team accountabilities
Scrum Team accountabilities
A product’s largest customer asks for a feature, while other evidence suggests a different improvement may create more value. Who remains accountable for maximizing the product’s value and effective Product Backlog management?
The customer because it supplies the largest share of revenue.
The Scrum Master because it is a conflict between stakeholders.
The Product Owner, while considering evidence and stakeholder needs.
The Developers because implementation effort determines product value.
Answer: The Product Owner, while considering evidence and stakeholder needs.
The Product Owner remains accountable for maximizing value and effective Product Backlog management. Stakeholder input and Developers’ knowledge are important evidence, but neither customer size nor technical effort transfers that accountability. The case does not give enough information to select the feature itself. It asks who must remain accountable while the competing evidence is considered, not whose opinion should always win.
Compare the other answer choices
The customer because it supplies the largest share of revenue.
A significant customer is an important stakeholder, but revenue size does not transfer Product Owner accountability.
The Scrum Master because it is a conflict between stakeholders.
The Scrum Master can help collaboration and effectiveness without taking over the product-value decision.
The Developers because implementation effort determines product value.
Developers contribute technical understanding, but effort alone is not value and does not transfer the Product Owner accountability.
Reference basis: The Scrum Guide — November 2020. These are original learning questions, not questions reproduced from the references.
QUESTION 03Events and inspection opportunities
Events and inspection opportunities
During a Sprint, a newly discovered reliability problem affects the work. The Sprint Goal remains valuable. Which TWO responses are consistent with Scrum? Select TWO.
Select all answers that apply.
Clarify and renegotiate scope with the Product Owner as more is learned, while protecting the Sprint Goal.
Reduce required quality measures so all originally selected items can still be counted Done.
Let Developers adapt their plan using the new information.
Treat every originally selected item as unchangeable even when learning changes the appropriate work.
Answer: Clarify and renegotiate scope with the Product Owner as more is learned, while protecting the Sprint Goal.; Let Developers adapt their plan using the new information.
Scrum allows learning during a Sprint. Developers can adapt their plan and clarify or renegotiate scope with the Product Owner, provided changes do not endanger the Sprint Goal. This differs from reducing quality or treating the original selection as a fixed contract immune to new information. The premise preserves the goal’s value, so it does not establish a reason for cancellation. The particular reliability fix still needs transparent discussion of its effects.
Compare the other answer choices
Reduce required quality measures so all originally selected items can still be counted Done.
Quality is not reduced to preserve an output count. Work must satisfy the applicable Definition of Done.
Treat every originally selected item as unchangeable even when learning changes the appropriate work.
The original selection is a plan, not a prohibition on learning and scope negotiation within the Sprint Goal boundary.
Reference basis: The Scrum Guide — November 2020. These are original learning questions, not questions reproduced from the references.
QUESTION 04Artifacts, commitments and Done
Artifacts, commitments and Done
A Scrum Team completes a usable Increment on Wednesday and satisfies its Definition of Done. Its Sprint Review is scheduled for Friday. Which TWO statements are consistent with the Scrum Guide? Select TWO.
Select all answers that apply.
The Increment may be delivered before Friday’s Sprint Review.
The Sprint Review must approve the Increment before any delivery is allowed.
The team can create another Increment during the same Sprint.
Releasing on Wednesday removes the need for a Sprint Review.
Answer: The Increment may be delivered before Friday’s Sprint Review.; The team can create another Increment during the same Sprint.
Meeting the Definition of Done makes the work part of an Increment. The Scrum Guide permits multiple Increments in a Sprint and permits delivery before the Sprint ends; the Review does not serve as a release authorization gate. An earlier delivery does not remove the event’s purpose of inspecting the Sprint outcome with stakeholders and adapting future work. These statements do not promise that every organization has no other legal or operational release requirements.
Compare the other answer choices
The Sprint Review must approve the Increment before any delivery is allowed.
The Review supports inspection and adaptation; it is explicitly not a gate to releasing value.
Releasing on Wednesday removes the need for a Sprint Review.
Delivering earlier does not cancel the Sprint Review or replace collaborative inspection with stakeholders.
Reference basis: The Scrum Guide — November 2020. These are original learning questions, not questions reproduced from the references.
QUESTION 05Self-management and coaching
Self-management and coaching
A newly formed Scrum Team is told that a department manager must decide who performs each task and how to perform it. The team already understands its product objective and applicable constraints. Which change best supports Scrum self-management?
Keep all task decisions external but rename the manager a facilitator.
Let the Scrum Team internally decide who does what, when and how within its accountabilities and constraints.
Remove the product objective so every person can work on an unrelated preference.
Transfer all task assignment to the Product Owner because value accountability includes deciding each technical step.
Answer: Let the Scrum Team internally decide who does what, when and how within its accountabilities and constraints.
A Scrum Team is self-managing: its members internally decide who does what, when and how. This does not remove product direction, quality obligations or the different Scrum accountabilities. The appropriate change is to allow internal decisions rather than preserve external task control under another title. Supporting the team may still require organizational coaching and clarity about legitimate constraints; self-management is not an absence of coordination.
Compare the other answer choices
Keep all task decisions external but rename the manager a facilitator.
Changing a title does not change the external control over decisions that should be made within the team.
Remove the product objective so every person can work on an unrelated preference.
Self-management operates with shared purpose and accountabilities; it is not unrelated individual work without a goal.
Transfer all task assignment to the Product Owner because value accountability includes deciding each technical step.
Value accountability does not make the Product Owner the dispatcher of every technical task or implementation method.
Reference basis: The Scrum Guide — November 2020. These are original learning questions, not questions reproduced from the references.
QUESTION 06Product value, backlog and stakeholders
Product value, backlog and stakeholders
A Product Goal concerns helping customers complete a booking successfully. Which TWO observations would more directly help investigate that outcome than a task-completion count? Select TWO.
Select all answers that apply.
The number of backlog items split into smaller tasks.
Observed booking-completion behavior together with its relevant context and limitations.
The number of meetings scheduled for the delivery team.
Customer feedback about obstacles encountered while attempting a booking.
Answer: Observed booking-completion behavior together with its relevant context and limitations.; Customer feedback about obstacles encountered while attempting a booking.
The goal concerns a customer outcome. Booking-completion observations and feedback about obstacles can provide evidence relevant to that outcome, provided the team examines context, measurement limitations and competing explanations. They do not by themselves prove causation or a calibrated business result. Counts of split tasks or scheduled meetings describe internal activity and cannot establish successful customer booking. These suggested observations are editorial applications of empiricism, not mandatory Scrum metrics.
Compare the other answer choices
The number of backlog items split into smaller tasks.
Task splitting describes how work is organized; it does not observe whether customers achieve the booking outcome.
The number of meetings scheduled for the delivery team.
Meeting counts measure activity. More meetings do not establish that customers can complete a booking successfully.
Reference basis: The Scrum Guide — November 2020. These are original learning questions, not questions reproduced from the references.
QUESTION 07Self-management and coaching
Facilitate decisions without replacing accountability
A Scrum Team finds that stakeholder access is restricted by an organizational meeting policy. Several key stakeholders can participate in a suitable Review arrangement if the policy barrier is addressed. Which TWO Scrum Master services are relevant? Select exactly TWO.
Select all answers that apply.
Permanently take Product Backlog ordering away from the Product Owner to simplify meeting access.
Replace the Review with an internal status meeting and defer stakeholder discussion until the product release.
Facilitate stakeholder collaboration as needed and help remove barriers between stakeholders and the Scrum Team.
Help ensure that the Review takes place as a productive inspection and adaptation opportunity within its timebox.
Replace all Reviews with one-way status slides and claim the interaction purpose is unchanged.
Answer: Facilitate stakeholder collaboration as needed and help remove barriers between stakeholders and the Scrum Team.; Help ensure that the Review takes place as a productive inspection and adaptation opportunity within its timebox.
The Scrum Master services include facilitating stakeholder collaboration and removing barriers between stakeholders and Scrum Teams, along with supporting positive productive events within their timeboxes. The case says a suitable Review arrangement is possible if the policy barrier is addressed.
Work on that barrier and preserve the Review opportunity to inspect outcomes and adapt with stakeholders. A one-way or internal-only status replacement postpones that collaboration, and meeting logistics do not transfer Product Owner ordering accountability. This does not grant authority to override every organizational policy.
Compare the other answer choices
Replace all Reviews with one-way status slides and claim the interaction purpose is unchanged.
A one-way status presentation does not preserve the collaborative inspection and adaptation purpose described for the Review.
Permanently take Product Backlog ordering away from the Product Owner to simplify meeting access.
Meeting access problems do not transfer Product Backlog ordering accountability.
Replace the Review with an internal status meeting and defer stakeholder discussion until the product release.
This bypasses the available solution to the stated access barrier and removes the Review stakeholder inspection and adaptation opportunity.
Reference basis: The Scrum Guide — November 2020. These are original learning questions, not questions reproduced from the references.
QUESTION 08Product value, backlog and stakeholders
Refine work and forecast with explicit assumptions
A Scrum Team has completed between five and seven similarly sized backlog items in each of its last four Sprints. Two Developers will be unavailable during the next Sprint. A stakeholder asks for a guaranteed date for twelve remaining items. What is the most defensible next conversation?
Explain the observed range and changed capacity, then discuss an updated forecast and the uncertainty behind it.
Promise twelve items in two Sprints because the historical average was six items per Sprint.
Keep the previous delivery forecast unchanged because stakeholder expectations should remain stable.
Ask the Scrum Master to assign a fixed item quota to each available Developer.
Answer: Explain the observed range and changed capacity, then discuss an updated forecast and the uncertainty behind it.
Past performance can inform a forecast when the work and operating conditions are relevant, but the changed capacity is material information. Discuss that evidence, the remaining work and uncertainty instead of presenting a historical average as a guarantee. Scrum does not prescribe this item-count forecasting technique or a universal formula. This fictional conversation applies empiricism and the Planning guidance about considering past performance, upcoming capacity and the Definition of Done; it does not infer an exact revised date from insufficient data.
Compare the other answer choices
Promise twelve items in two Sprints because the historical average was six items per Sprint.
An average is not a guarantee, and applying it without accounting for the stated capacity change hides relevant uncertainty.
Keep the previous delivery forecast unchanged because stakeholder expectations should remain stable.
Preserving an outdated expectation does not make the forecast more reliable. New evidence should be made transparent and considered.
Ask the Scrum Master to assign a fixed item quota to each available Developer.
The Scrum Master does not replace Developers self-management with assigned individual quotas; the quota also does not establish a reliable forecast.
Reference basis: The Scrum Guide — November 2020. These are original learning questions, not questions reproduced from the references.
QUESTION 09Empiricism and Scrum values
Empiricism and Scrum values
A team reports only the items it expects to finish and removes blocked items from its visible Sprint Backlog. The Sprint Goal is now at risk, but stakeholders see a healthy-looking list. What is the most appropriate response?
Freeze the visible list until the Sprint Review so stakeholders are not distracted.
Move the blocked work into a private spreadsheet and update it more frequently.
Expose the current work and impediments so Developers can inspect progress and adapt the plan.
Replace the Sprint Goal with a list of whichever items remain easy to finish.
Answer: Expose the current work and impediments so Developers can inspect progress and adapt the plan.
Transparency requires a useful representation of the actual work, including relevant problems and uncertainty. Removing blocked work creates an appearance of progress while hiding the evidence needed for adaptation. Restore visibility and let Developers inspect how the situation affects the Sprint Goal and their current plan. The response does not require broadcasting every operational detail to everyone; it requires making the relevant state understandable to those using it.
Compare the other answer choices
Freeze the visible list until the Sprint Review so stakeholders are not distracted.
Deferring visibility allows decisions to continue on a misleading picture while the goal is already at risk.
Move the blocked work into a private spreadsheet and update it more frequently.
A faster private update does not fix the lack of shared visibility for the people making the decision.
Replace the Sprint Goal with a list of whichever items remain easy to finish.
The Sprint Goal provides focus. Relabeling easy output as a new goal hides the problem instead of inspecting it.
Reference basis: The Scrum Guide — November 2020. These are original learning questions, not questions reproduced from the references.
QUESTION 10Empiricism and Scrum values
Empiricism and Scrum values
An appointment service has little evidence about whether customers will use a proposed reminder workflow. The team can deliver a small usable slice and inspect its results. Which approach best reflects empiricism?
Approve the entire workflow because the initial proposal was detailed.
Wait until a prediction can guarantee that customers will use it.
Use the number of tasks completed as proof that customers received value.
Make a bounded change, inspect what happens and adapt the next decision from the observations.
Answer: Make a bounded change, inspect what happens and adapt the next decision from the observations.
Empiricism uses experience and observation to develop knowledge. A bounded usable change can produce evidence that informs further product decisions. Define what to observe and acknowledge limitations; a small slice is not automatic proof that the whole product direction is correct. A detailed plan, an output count or a demand for certainty does not replace learning from what actually happens. The small-slice method is this scenario’s practical application, not a mandatory Scrum experiment template.
Compare the other answer choices
Approve the entire workflow because the initial proposal was detailed.
Detail can clarify a proposal, but it does not establish that customers will use the workflow.
Wait until a prediction can guarantee that customers will use it.
A guarantee may be unavailable in a complex problem. Waiting for one prevents the feasible learning opportunity described.
Use the number of tasks completed as proof that customers received value.
Completed tasks measure output. They do not establish the customer behavior that is uncertain in this case.
Reference basis: The Scrum Guide — November 2020. These are original learning questions, not questions reproduced from the references.
What this practice covers
Selected foundations across eight lessons in six local teaching groups; not complete official competency coverage.
A free foundation path with original workplace cases, retrieval cards and a suggested two-week sequence.
48 original fixed tasks (38 single choice and 10 select-TWO), not a full-length official examination or score predictor.
10 public examples48 question variants in the studio48 task families
Review status: Independent educator review and learner calibration are pending. Use these selected foundation examples alongside the coverage map and current official references.
Start with the lesson linked to an unfamiliar topic, try a focused set in the practice studio, then return to the review cards. Your practice progress stays in this browser.
Catalog scope record: . This records the saved content mapping, not a guarantee that every external rule is current.
Selected foundations across eight lessons in six local teaching groups; not complete official competency coverage.
48 original fixed tasks (38 single choice and 10 select-TWO), not a full-length official examination or score predictor.
No learner trial or calibrated difficulty; professional educator review pending.
No downloadable PDF or video companion is claimed; browser printing is a separate utility.
Check the exam provider's current information for registration, test rules and official preparation materials. The exam guide collects the relevant official references.